Permanent Daylight Saving Time Dangers
Although there are certainly problems with the transition to daylight saving time, AASM believes that the US Senate made a mistake when it voted in favor of permanent daylight saving time.
At the very least, AASM believes that the Senate erred in not allowing adequate time for discussion and debate. In 2021, AASM requested a Senate hearing on the debate over daylight saving time, which was ultimately held on March 9 of this year. However, this hearing only allowed for minimal presentation of evidence and almost no debate. Instead, the bill making daylight saving time permanent passed by unanimous consent, which was almost certainly a mistake.
After the vote, many Senators complained that they didn’t know the vote was taking place. The vote was bumped to Tuesday, March 15, to allow Senator Wicker to block the bill when it came up for unanimous content. However, he declined to make that objection, saying that he was “more interested in fighting other battles.” No one else raised a complaint and the bill passed.
Although this new arrangement would eliminate the problem of switching clocks twice a year, it wouldn’t be optimal. As AASM explained, daylight saving time is not as good for people as standard time.
The US briefly tried full-time daylight saving time in response to the oil embargo by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). During this experiment, fatalities increased among school children between January and April, likely because the kids were heading to school in the dark. AASM also notes that daylight saving time may be less aligned with the human circadian rhythm. The effect of having more darkness in the morning and more light at night makes people want to shift their rhythms later in the day, leading people to feel that they are constantly misaligned with natural rhythms of the world. This could lead to chronic sleep loss.
AASM describes the phenomenon of social jet lag, where people’s circadian rhythms don’t correlate to the scheduled demands of work and school. This could potentially lead to an increased risk of obesity, cardiovascular disease, and depression. This effect would be worse for areas in the western part of the time zone, such as Omaha and the rest of Nebraska that’s in the Central Time Zone.
Because these effects were so strong–and the proposed energy savings nonexistent–Congress eliminated permanent daylight saving time after just one winter. AASM hopes we don’t make the same mistake. Instead, the House might adopt a bill favoring permanent standard time, which the Senate might approve during the reconciliation process.